The succession of the slain leader’s son is seen as a signal of the Islamic republic’s defiance of Israel and the United States, and of continuity during crisis.

General Motors, Ford and other established automakers risk becoming relics if they don’t catch up to Chinese carmakers and technology companies in electric vehicles and self-driving cars.

Burner accounts on social media sites can increasingly be analyzed to identify the pseudonymous users who post to them using AI in research that has far-reaching consequences for privacy on the Internet, researchers said.

The finding, from a recently published research paper, is based on results of experiments correlating specific individuals with accounts or posts across more than one social media platform. The success rate was far greater than existing classical deanonymization work that relied on humans assembling structured data sets suitable for algorithmic matching or manual work by skilled investigators. Recall—that is, how many users were successfully deanonymized—was as high as 68 percent. Precision—meaning the rate of guesses that correctly identify the user—was up to 90 percent.

I know what you posted last year

The findings have the potential to upend pseudonymity, an imperfect but often sufficient privacy measure used by many people to post queries and participate in sometimes sensitive public discussions while making it hard for others to positively identify the speakers. The ability to cheaply and quickly identify the people behind such obscured accounts opens them up to doxxing, stalking, and the assembly of detailed marketing profiles that track where speakers live, what they do for a living, and other personal information. This pseudonymity measure no longer holds.

“Our findings have significant implications for online privacy,” the researchers wrote. “The average online user has long operated under an implicit threat model where they have assumed pseudonymity provides adequate protection because targeted deanonymization would require extensive effort. LLMs invalidate this assumption.”

An overview of the pseudonymous stripping framework.

The researchers collected several datasets from public social media sites to test the techniques while preserving the privacy of the speakers. One of them collected posts from Hacker News and LinkedIn profiles and then linked them by using cross-platform references that appeared in user profiles. They then stripped all identifying references from the posts and ran a large language model on them. A second dataset was obtained from a Netflix release of micro-identities, such as individual preferences, recommendations, and transaction records. A 2008 research paper showed the list could identify users and ID their political affiliations and other personal information. The last technique split a single user’s Reddit history.

“What we found is that these AI agents can do something that was previously very difficult: starting from free text (like an anonymized interview transcript) they can work their way to the full identity of a person,” Simon Lermen, a co-author of the paper, told Ars. “This is a pretty new capability, previous approaches on re-identification generally required structured data, and two datasets with a similar schema that could be linked together.”

Unlike those older pseudonymity-stripping methods, Lermen said, AI agents can browse the web and interact with it in many of the same ways humans do. They can use reasoning to match potential individuals. In one experiment, the researchers looked at responses given in a questionnaire Anthropic took about how various people use AI in their daily lives. Using the information taken from answers, the researchers were able to positively identify 7 percent of 125 participants.

End-to-end deanonymization from a single interview transcript (with details altered to protect the subject’s identity). An LLM agent extracted structured identity signals from a conversation, autonomously searched the web to identify a candidate individual, and verified the candidate matches all extracted claims. While a 7 percent recall is relatively low, it demonstrates the growing capability of AI to identify people based on very general information they gave. “The fact that AI can do this at all is a noteworthy result,” Lermen said. “And as AI systems get better, they will likely get better at finding more and more identities.”

In a second experiment, the researchers gathered comments made in 2024 from the r/movies subreddit and at least one of five smaller communities: r/horror, r/MovieSuggestions, r/Letterboxd, r/TrueFilm, and r/MovieDetails. The results showed that the more movies a candidate discussed, the easier it was to identify them. An average of 3.1 percent of users sharing one movie could be identified with a 90 percent precision, and 1.2 percent of them at a 99 percent precision. With five to nine shared movies, 90 percent and 99 percent precision rose to 8.4 percent and 2.5 percent of users, respectively. More than 10 shared movies bumped the percentage to 48.1 percent and 17 percent.

Recall at various precision thresholds.

In a third experiment, the researchers took 5,000 users from the Netflix dataset and added another 5,000 “distraction” identities of people not in the results. They then added to the list of 10,000 candidate profiles 5,000 query distractors comprising users who appear only in a query set, with no true match in the candidate pool.

Compared to a classical baseline that mimics the Netflix Prize attack to LLM deanonymization, the latter far outperformed the former.

Screenshot

The researchers wrote:

(a) The precision of classical attacks drops very fast, explaining its low recall. In contrast, the precision of LLM-based attacks decays more gracefully as the attacker makes more guesses. (b) The classical attack almost fails completely even at moderately low precision. In contrast, even the simplest LLM attack (Search) achieves non-trivial recall at low precision, and extending it with Reason and Calibrate steps doubles Recall @99% Precision.

The results show that LLMs, while still prone to false positives and other weaknesses, are quickly outstripping more traditional, resource-intensive methods for identifying users online.

The researchers went on to propose mitigations, including platforms enforcing rate limits on API access to user data, detecting automated scraping, and restricting bulk data exports. LLM providers could also monitor for the misuse of their models in deanonymization attacks and build guardrails that make models refuse deanonymization requests.

Of course, another option is for people to dramatically curb their use of social media, or at a minimum, regularly delete posts after a set time threshold.

If LLMs' success in deanonymizing people improves, the researchers warn, governments could use the techniques to unmask online critics, corporations can assemble customer profiles for "hyper-targeted advertising," and attackers could build profiles of targets at scale to launch highly personalized social engineering scams.

"Recent advances in LLM capabilities have made it clear that there is an urgent need to rethink various aspects of computer security in the wake of LLM-driven offensive cyber capabilities, the researchers warned. "Our work shows that the same is likely true for privacy as well."

Read full article

Comments

She was thrilled to become the first teacher from a government-sponsored school in India to get a Fulbright exchange award to learn from U.S. schools. People asked two questions that clouded her joy.

(Image credit: Anupam Gangopadhyay)

Sen. Katie Britt, Republican of Alabama, is a budding bipartisan dealmaker. Her latest assignment: helping negotiate changes to immigration enforcement tactics.

(Image credit: Andrew Harnik)

Bourbon was once hailed as the poor man’s drink. The spirit has since developed, however, from a mass-market American staple into a luxury class, and limited releases, higher prices, and brands vying for prestige have caused a crowded top tier.

Even though the premium field has widened, the very top of the market remains stubbornly narrow, according to whiskey expert Fred Minnick. 

During a blind tasting of his top 100 American whiskeys of 2025, Minnick evaluated leading contenders anonymously. Even without labels, the rankings reflected the same hierarchy seen at retail and on the secondary market. The most scarce, high-status bottles still rose to the top, regardless of brand recognition. 

George T. Stagg claimed the number one spot, followed by Sazerac Rye 18 Year at number two. Both are part of the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection, one of the most limited and consistently in-demand product lines in American spirits. Buffalo Trace, beyond its Antique Collection, also produces the popular—and often hard to find—Eagle Rare, Blanton’s, Weller, and Pappy Van Winkle whiskey brands.

Minnick’s ranking reinforced a key dynamic shaping the bourbon market. While dozens of producers now compete in the premium tier, demand continues to concentrate on a small set of legacy brands whose supply is structurally constrained by long aging cycles and finite inventory. Scarcity, not novelty, appears to be one of the most powerful differentiators at the top end.

That scarcity has also shaped customer expectations. “People who are out buying bourbon want to buy something that feels fancy,” Minnick said, who’s next book, Bottom Shelf, comes out next month. “Bourbon, which used to be the poor man’s drink, is now like a fancy man’s drink.”

Those changing expectations are reflected not only in pricing and branding but in how elite bourbon is judged. Minnick noted that higher proof and longer finish—once defining markers of top-tier releases—no longer carry the same weight on their own. “For the first time in my career, I’m breaking protocol,” he said. “I’m not rewarding the longer finish.”

Instead, Minnick favored the bourbon that delivered what he described as a fuller, more immersive experience, one that “absolutely drenches my tongue and completely encompasses my entire mouth.” 

While each bottle featured in Minnick’s review is among the top American whiskeys, the most supply-constrained, prestige-driven brands still set the market’s upper bound. And without labels, the qualities that signal luxury still held up under blind tasting.

Check out the top five bottles below, and watch the full video on YouTube: 

1. George T. Stagg, Buffalo Trace Antique Collection
2. Sazerac Rye 18 Year, Buffalo Trace Antique Collection
3. Bomberger’s PFG
4. Brother Justus Founders Reserve American Single Malt
5. Heaven Hill 90th Anniversary

—Leila Sheridan

---

This article originally appeared on Fast Company’s sister website, Inc.com. 

Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.